Ok, this isn’t the normal “potato” humor of G+ this is a serious issue.

In some paradoxical potato dimension you have 1000 lbs of potatoes. and they are “pure potatoes” (mind you the materials may not be exactly correct but it works the same). you have in that 1000lbs of potato 99% water and 1% “potato stuff”. Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?

Answer later. **Discuss**

-991- 990.1 pounds (assuming the sack has no weight)

revised answer was done using a calculator, first answer was not. logic was soundCould be written as a two step iterative.

-991- 990.1 pounds (assuming the sack has no weight)

revised answer was done using a calculator, first answer was not. logic was soundCould be written as a two step iterative.

-991- 990.1 pounds (assuming the sack has no weight)

revised answer was done using a calculator, first answer was not. logic was soundCould be written as a two step iterative.

one would assume, and this is the first time I have seen

thisanswer 😉one would assume, and this is the first time I have seen

thisanswer 😉one would assume, and this is the first time I have seen

thisanswer 😉Art E Apparently, I have forgotten how to do percentages and powers of ten.

Art E Apparently, I have forgotten how to do percentages and powers of ten.

Art E Apparently, I have forgotten how to do percentages and powers of ten.

The weight of water in the fresh potatoes is 0.99*1000.

If x is the weight of water lost from the potatoes when they dehydrate then 0.98(1000 – x) is the weight of water in the dehydrated potatoes. Therefore:

0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x

1000 – x = 1000 – 500 = 500

The weight of water in the fresh potatoes is 0.99*1000.

If x is the weight of water lost from the potatoes when they dehydrate then 0.98(1000 – x) is the weight of water in the dehydrated potatoes. Therefore:

0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x

1000 – x = 1000 – 500 = 500

The weight of water in the fresh potatoes is 0.99*1000.

If x is the weight of water lost from the potatoes when they dehydrate then 0.98(1000 – x) is the weight of water in the dehydrated potatoes. Therefore:

0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x

1000 – x = 1000 – 500 = 500

Reread the problem.

The weight of the water is 990 lbs.

1% of 990 is 9.9 lbs.

990 – 9.9 = 980.1.

Add back the 10 lbs of “stuff” and you have a total remaining weight of 990.1 lbs in the sack.

Reread the problem.

The weight of the water is 990 lbs.

1% of 990 is 9.9 lbs.

990 – 9.9 = 980.1.

Add back the 10 lbs of “stuff” and you have a total remaining weight of 990.1 lbs in the sack.

Reread the problem.

The weight of the water is 990 lbs.

1% of 990 is 9.9 lbs.

990 – 9.9 = 980.1.

Add back the 10 lbs of “stuff” and you have a total remaining weight of 990.1 lbs in the sack.

^^ this is normal math thinking…. I outlined the theorum

^^ this is normal math thinking…. I outlined the theorum

^^ this is normal math thinking…. I outlined the theorum

Art E You still made an error in calculating percentage.

~~And where did the 500 come from?~~NevermindYour equation [0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x] is incorrect.

The problem states that “1% of the water evaporates”. The water is only 99% of the contents.

The amount of water lost,

x = 0.01 (0.99 * 1000)

= 0.099 * 1000

= 9.9

Art E You still made an error in calculating percentage.

~~And where did the 500 come from?~~NevermindYour equation [0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x] is incorrect.

The problem states that “1% of the water evaporates”. The water is only 99% of the contents.

The amount of water lost,

x = 0.01 (0.99 * 1000)

= 0.099 * 1000

= 9.9

Art E You still made an error in calculating percentage.

~~And where did the 500 come from?~~NevermindYour equation [0.99 * 1000 – 0.98(1000 – x) = x] is incorrect.

The problem states that “1% of the water evaporates”. The water is only 99% of the contents.

The amount of water lost,

x = 0.01 (0.99 * 1000)

= 0.099 * 1000

= 9.9

Here is the full explanation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato_paradox

the example I depicted was 1000 but this explanation used 100…. Same idea

Here is the full explanation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato_paradox

the example I depicted was 1000 but this explanation used 100…. Same idea

Here is the full explanation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato_paradox

the example I depicted was 1000 but this explanation used 100…. Same idea

But that wasn’t the problem that you stated. There is a difference between a loss of 1% of the water and a reduction in the percentage of water by 1%.. Even in mathematics, language matters.

But that wasn’t the problem that you stated. There is a difference between a loss of 1% of the water and a reduction in the percentage of water by 1%.. Even in mathematics, language matters.

But that wasn’t the problem that you stated. There is a difference between a loss of 1% of the water and a reduction in the percentage of water by 1%.. Even in mathematics, language matters.

I stated evaporation…. Which…. Is dehydration

I stated evaporation…. Which…. Is dehydration

I stated evaporation…. Which…. Is dehydration

Art E The method by which the reduction of water occurs doesn’t matter. What matters is how you specify the relationship of the reduction to the entirety. There is a difference between a reduction from 99% to 98% and a reduction of 1% of 99%. A reduction from 99% to 98% of the total mass does not equal a 1% reduction in the mass of a portion of the total.

This is something that I always watch out for when things go on sale in stores. 20% off the original price with an additional 50% discount does not always mean 70% off the original price. Sometimes it is less and you end up paying more than you expect.

Art E The method by which the reduction of water occurs doesn’t matter. What matters is how you specify the relationship of the reduction to the entirety. There is a difference between a reduction from 99% to 98% and a reduction of 1% of 99%. A reduction from 99% to 98% of the total mass does not equal a 1% reduction in the mass of a portion of the total.

This is something that I always watch out for when things go on sale in stores. 20% off the original price with an additional 50% discount does not always mean 70% off the original price. Sometimes it is less and you end up paying more than you expect.

Art E The method by which the reduction of water occurs doesn’t matter. What matters is how you specify the relationship of the reduction to the entirety. There is a difference between a reduction from 99% to 98% and a reduction of 1% of 99%. A reduction from 99% to 98% of the total mass does not equal a 1% reduction in the mass of a portion of the total.

This is something that I always watch out for when things go on sale in stores. 20% off the original price with an additional 50% discount does not always mean 70% off the original price. Sometimes it is less and you end up paying more than you expect.

I stated that the 1% came from the water side…. Not “overall”

I stated that the 1% came from the water side…. Not “overall”

I stated that the 1% came from the water side…. Not “overall”

Art E But it didn’t come from the water side! The percentage of water at the beginning is 99% of the

overallweight. The final percentage of water after dehydration is 98% of theoverallweight. It is not a reduction of 1% of the water, but a reduction of 1% of therelativeoverall weight.Art E But it didn’t come from the water side! The percentage of water at the beginning is 99% of the

overallweight. The final percentage of water after dehydration is 98% of theoverallweight. It is not a reduction of 1% of the water, but a reduction of 1% of therelativeoverall weight.Art E But it didn’t come from the water side! The percentage of water at the beginning is 99% of the

overallweight. The final percentage of water after dehydration is 98% of theoverallweight. It is not a reduction of 1% of the water, but a reduction of 1% of therelativeoverall weight.Read again…. I stated 99% water and 1% potato stuff…. Over night it was reduced to 98% by evaporation…..

Read again…. I stated 99% water and 1% potato stuff…. Over night it was reduced to 98% by evaporation…..

Read again…. I stated 99% water and 1% potato stuff…. Over night it was reduced to 98% by evaporation…..

Art E Copied and pasted from above: Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?

You were saying?

Art E Copied and pasted from above: Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?

You were saying?

Art E Copied and pasted from above: Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?

You were saying?

Here

–>you have in that 1000lbs of potato 99% water and 1% “potato stuff”. Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?Here

–>you have in that 1000lbs of potato 99% water and 1% “potato stuff”. Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?Here

–>you have in that 1000lbs of potato 99% water and 1% “potato stuff”. Over night, 1% of the water evaporates, how much does your sack of potatoes weigh?In your answer, 1% of the water did not evaporate.

The actual percentage is 51%.

The amount of water was reduced by 500 pounds.

500/990 = 0.5050505050…

which we will round out to 51%

In your answer, 1% of the water did not evaporate.

The actual percentage is 51%.

The amount of water was reduced by 500 pounds.

500/990 = 0.5050505050…

which we will round out to 51%

In your answer, 1% of the water did not evaporate.

The actual percentage is 51%.

The amount of water was reduced by 500 pounds.

500/990 = 0.5050505050…

which we will round out to 51%

::facepalm:: but yes…. 1% did evaporate… That was part of the problem

::facepalm:: but yes…. 1% did evaporate… That was part of the problem

::facepalm:: but yes…. 1% did evaporate… That was part of the problem

Let’s look at this problem in terms of something that wont evaporate.

There are 100 coins in a sock. 99% are pennies. How many pennies would you have to remove from the sock for the sock to contain 98% pennies?

Obviously, pennies don’t evaporate. And running through the same set of equations that you used to solve your potato problem, your answer would be 50 pennies, or just over 1/2 (51%) of the pennies in the sock.

In 100 coins: 99 pennies represents 99%

In 50 coins: 49 pennies represents 98%

Let’s look at this problem in terms of something that wont evaporate.

There are 100 coins in a sock. 99% are pennies. How many pennies would you have to remove from the sock for the sock to contain 98% pennies?

Obviously, pennies don’t evaporate. And running through the same set of equations that you used to solve your potato problem, your answer would be 50 pennies, or just over 1/2 (51%) of the pennies in the sock.

In 100 coins: 99 pennies represents 99%

In 50 coins: 49 pennies represents 98%

Let’s look at this problem in terms of something that wont evaporate.

There are 100 coins in a sock. 99% are pennies. How many pennies would you have to remove from the sock for the sock to contain 98% pennies?

Obviously, pennies don’t evaporate. And running through the same set of equations that you used to solve your potato problem, your answer would be 50 pennies, or just over 1/2 (51%) of the pennies in the sock.

In 100 coins: 99 pennies represents 99%

In 50 coins: 49 pennies represents 98%